Past imperfect
Consider Kodak. It literally ruled the world of photographic and motion picture film. It even had a track record of creating well-regarded cameras. Yet when single lens reflex cameras with interchangeable lenses from Pentax and Nikon attracted photographers’ attention with relatively affordable cameras, Kodak abandoned its 35mm and large format camera business, focused on making 35mm film for those single lens reflex cameras, and introduced a nearly endless succession of cheap cameras that used drop-in film cartridges.
Studio photographers were still using larger format cameras and, primarily, Kodak film, as were the vast majority of feature film producers (though Kodak let itself be outbid by Fujifilm as the “official” film on the 1984 Olympics), but Kodak began to lose focus.
A distorted lens
It had developed a digital camera, but didn’t understand the concept of sacrificing tradition in favor of something new. Rather than create decent digital cameras (and the digital camera cards that replaced film), its strategic vision grew fuzzy.
It introduced printers, hoping that ink would be the new film (or safety razor), but it didn’t seem to grasp the idea that razors from blade manufacturers, printers from ink makers, and cameras from film companies are worth selling at the lowest possible price… because the real revenue will come from the sales of blades, ink, and film.
Brand promises
This is an object lesson for America. We have been, for more than a century, a beacon of hope, the promise of prosperity, and the defender of freedom around the world. Those were our products and our brand. Yet, slowly, we’ve let Washington abandon those ideals.
Reagan denigrated education, proposing the elimination of the just-created Department of Education. Newt Gingrich was the ringleader of a take-no-prisoners, make-no-compromises effort that made it far more difficult to pass beneficial legislation. The whole Tea Party movement (whose name reflected an act aimed at overturning imperial law whose drafting involved no American colonists’ participation) was designed to shut out alternative points of view and prevent negotiation. Mitch McConnell was forthright in declaring that his sole purpose was to prevent the passage of any Democrat-supported legislation and ensure that Barack Obama was a one-term president.
Where we came from
None of that was emblematic of the country that provided the men and materiel to defeat the Kaiser in World War I; rallied to survive the Depression; worked in unison to overwhelm the Axis of Germnay, Italy, and Japan in World War II; rebuilt the country’s business and consumer sectors in the post-war world; provided funds for reconstruction in Europe and Japan that turned adversaries into allies; overturned decades of civil and voting rights inequities; pressured a corrupt and vindicative president to resign; used protest to end an unwinnable war; and actually advanced sufficiently to have a Federal budget surplus.
All of that is in jeopardy.
Stability, ineptitude, and freedom
No successful business ignores changes that threaten to eliminate the economic reliability and social stability that corporations need to survive and grow. Yet businesses can easily remove employees and executives who lack the aptitude to benefit the company. Our system of government hinders that.
A kakistocracy like the one we have — government run by the least qualified and/or most corrupt — can endure only when the electorate trades liberty for safety. The safety that protects the 75” TVs, Barcaloungers, fast food, dual SUVs, and free home delivery of everything from chili to chainsaws.
When convenience is preferred in the face of Constitutional malfeasance, when it’s easier to do nothing than take action , when it’s simpler to listen to others than to analyze facts for yourself, and when officials work against stakeholders’ best interests to prevent acts of retribution against themselves, the results are sure to be disastrous… whether you’re a company or a country.
So… what have you got to lose?


RSS Feed